Imagining is not just for John Lennon
-- Imagine --I have been a fan of this song for most of my life,…
Sadly the article’s source was from a “Don’t Tread On Me” website, so I am not sure just how accurate the “Christian” part is as these groups often marginalize the facts to make it more offensive to their audience. Groups like ISIS are usually nondiscriminatory in which infidels, anyone who doesn’t believe the same way they do, they assault and kill.
Another friend who has become quite anti-religious due to behaviors like these and others in the name of the local “god” has often asked if maybe we should abolish religion in general as it seems to be the cause of so many of these atrocities in the world today.
I say no, not because I support any of the hateful and despicable things that man is capable of doing to his fellow man, but for two basic reasons:
Śhruti (श्रुति), the Sanskrit name for Scripture or Holy Texts, seems to hold on to its core Truths even when people and organizations attempt to change it for their own purposes; we find it in many traditions.
I have spoken with several Imams that are sickened and disgusted with how the Quran and the Sunnah/Hadith are manipulated by many of their brothers to become this current cesspool of hatred and violence we have seen through much of the Middle East in recent years. Yes, the documents allow for fighting and such, but have you looked at the Old Testament and some of the things that it calls for and justifies? But these are things that I find have more to do with the cultural contexts of the places and times for which they were written and never actually intended to be the laws for eternity.
The Jewish Torah has laws and rules that are designed to explain a moral life from the perspective of the tail end of the Bronze Age, about 3500 years ago, from an Egyptian/Nomadic point of view. The Christian New Testament does the same thing from the time and culture of the Roman Empire and the Quran, and particularly the Sunnah and hadith, are the Arabian culture of the Seventh century.
On a personal observation, I have always found the Abrahamic traditions to be interesting in that they all find it necessary to deify some aspect of their founder or the founder’s principles and the following prophet/teacher tends to decry the deification.
Tradition Deified Aspect Judaism The Law of Moses Christianity The Founder/Teacher Islam The Culture of the Prophet
No matter how much manipulation has been done, the core Truth of the documents is still there and can be gleaned by careful study and contemplation thereof.
If I thought for just a moment that the destruction of all the world’s religious documents and the disbanding of the practices would solve the world’s problems for even as little as five minutes, I would jump on the bandwagon and lead the burning parties myself. The hard reality is that it would be a waste of time and energy on all fronts.
Religion is not the cause of the problem, it is the scapegoat used to justify and proselytize one man’s judgment and hatred for another while attempting to authorize it by calling it the “will of God.”
If there were a way to remove religion from the equation completely, you would find no change, other than the validation used. Knowing most of man, I would suspect that gender, orientation, cultural ancestry, financial status or any number of silly ways we humans find to break ourselves up into “Us'” and “Them’s”.
By using Religion, the manipulators convince us that “God is on OUR side” so it is not only justified, but the right thing to do. The operative word above is “manipulators”; they are not concerned with anything but their own goals and objectives and the means are only the theater by which they project them upon the masses. If you took the “God” out of the equation, do you honestly think those who want power or control would not find another way to acquire it?