Oxymorons pt2 – The “Why”
For all the altruistic reasons that I can think of, the simple fact is that there were (and are) only three reasons.
- Those items are some of my personal favorite facepalm moments. We are supposedly an intelligent species, I keep wondering when we will begin acting like one.
- A warning of things to come.
- I had a plate of cheese and crackers nearby and wanted to have a bit of a wine fest, so I let it rip (next time I will just stick with a bottle of Two Buck Chuck, a better buzz).
The Universe is actually an exceedingly just and balanced place, with both the good and the bad that happens being deserved. People get the reactions to the thoughts and actions that they put out into the world (consciously or otherwise), as well as nation-states getting the leadership (or lack thereof) the people deserve or, more accurately, create (scary thought that).
Many people do not like this philosophy and as often that I hear the examples of good things happening to bad people, as well as the reverse, I find it to be the only way that the Universe and/or Bob (God) could be anything resembling good. Add to this the idea of reincarnation, that multiple lifetimes are involved, and it makes for an excellent and fair system from the big picture, while not so much from the smaller, self-induced amnesiac, perspective.
I spend a lot of time contemplating the likely reaction to the actions of the world today. We are on a path of self-destruction and I cannot help but wonder if George Carlin was right when he reminded us that “Saving the Planet” is an arrogant self-indulgent statement, the Earth will definitely outlast mankind, it’s us that needs the saving if we wish to continue to live here.
Life will always exist on this planet, the question is if it will be compatible with our current form, homosapien.
Compassion of this type is like telling someone they are about to step into a bear-trap, it is rarely appreciated, but, in my opinion, is preferable in that it allows the avoidance the oncoming pain. Sadly, we tend to be so focused on our perspective that we dismiss the warning, step into the trap and then blame the person who warned us for not being more forceful(?) with it (a no win situation for sure, now you know why prophets tend to keep their mouth shut).
It reminds me of the old joke:
The river is rising and Mrs. Smith’s house is flooding, a truck comes by and offers to take her to higher ground, “Oh, no thank you, I have faith in God to protect me.”The water rises higher and a boat comes by an offers to take her to safety, and once again, the response is, “Oh, no thank you, I have faith in God to protect me.”
Finally, the water is up to the roof and a helicopter drops a ladder to her and still she says, “Oh, no thank you, I have faith in God to protect me.”
Eventually the water rushes over her and she drowns in the swollen river. Mrs. Smith comes before God and asks, “I had faith in you to protect me, why did you allow this to happen?”
God looks at her and says, “I sent a truck, a boat and even a helicopter, what more did you expect?”
So I ask you, what more do YOU expect and what will it take to motivate you to change things, or do you like where they are going?
Of course, there is the off chance that I am just a bit pessimistic and Politicians and Corporations really do have our best interest at heart and I am just to short-sighted to see it (sure, and donkey’s fly).
I agree with what you said.
People get the reactions to the thoughts and actions that they put out into the world (consciously or otherwise)
That reminds me of what Dyer said about what the Movie the Secret missed. You do not attract what you want, you attract what you are. I heard him say that in the live weekend long workshop in Maui on Excuses BeGone (on audible that is). I would have loved to have seen him in Maui
Hemachandra: Starting with The Secret, which has reached such a wide audience, the emphasis in today’s popular understanding of the law of attraction is predominantly about material wealth. What are the consequences of that kind of skew to this teaching?
Dyer: First of all, I think the law of attraction has been misstated. You do not attract what you want. You attract what you are. That’s how the law of attraction works.
Twenty-five centuries ago in ancient China, Lao-tzu said there were four virtues. If you live them—if you live in a place of God-consciousness—the universe will give you God-consciousness. If you live in a place of ego-consciousness, though, the universe will give you more of that.
One virtue is reverence for all of life. You revere all life. You never kill, you never harm, you never wish harm, and you never have thoughts of harm directed toward yourself or others. Another virtue is natural sincerity, which is manifested as honesty. Just be honest with who you are. Don’t pretend to be something you’re not. Don’t be a phony. Walk your talk. That’s how God works, so doing it is emulating how Source works. The third virtue is gentleness, which manifests as kindness toward all others.
The fourth virtue, which is relevant here, is supportiveness. If you say to the universe, “Gimme, gimme, gimme,” which is what a lot of the work around the law of attraction says because of a misinterpretation, then the universe gives you back what you offered out. You get more “gimme, gimme, gimme.” “Gimme” means you don’t have enough. You have a shortage. The universe just keeps giving you more shortage because of what you’re thinking and saying.
If, on the other hand, you say to the universe again and again, “How may I serve? How may I serve? How may I serve?” and you live a life of constancy reflecting that principle, the universe will respond back, “How may I serve you?”